IMO, Dynamo can do most of what GH can do geometrically. If you have a Rhino/GH licence and feel Dynamo is lacking, then use Rhino.Inside, it is there for that reason (although, I’m sure deep down, Autodesk would prefer you use Dynamo! Ha!).Īlso, remember that GH has quite a few more years on Dynamo and has a lot more community created Plugins which may make dynamo look like it doesn’t have all the things and why some practices prefer GH as they have a lot of experience using it.
Use the best one at your disposal at the time you need them. And therefore it would be a shame if it would only focus on documentation. This is the reason why I think that Dynamo could be exactly the design tool that is missing in Revit.
#FORMZ VS FUSION 360 SOFTWARE#
By comparison, it is like owning a Macbook Pro, but need a Dell workstation to do some word processing, because Apple doesn’t have the software to do that. Firms are fully dependent on non-Autodesk software to do design work and there is where the problem lies. Unfortunately, Revit doesn’t have design tools within Revit nor does it have separate high-end software for design in their AEC collection. Ideally, you would want the same with Revit, where you can either use Revit to do design work or Rhino which can be imported or linked within Revit without disrupting the design process. The users can use whatever they feel comfortable in. But you can also use Word on a Mac as well. Apple has a text editing software called Pages. To make my analogy of Apple a little bit more clear.
0 kommentar(er)
